marmalade web design london - Blog Random thoughts from within theJar. Design, inspiration, web, online, and marketing http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:08:00 +0000 The Effects of Line Length of Reading Online <img src="http://cdn.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/bc19ed76efcc9af734277eee23ae6239.jpg" alt="" class=""/><br/><p> In a recent study on the <a href="http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/72/LineLength.asp">effects of line length on reading speed</a>, comprehension and user statisfaction conducted by the Software Usability ResearchLaboratory (SURL) at Wichita State University it was found that 95 character per line (cpl) was the most efficient overall.</p> <h3> The Procedure</h3> <p> The study was conducted in a controlled environment using local files to reduce download time, a previous and next button and IE6 as the prefered browser. Each participant read eight short news articles with two news articles for each line length, 35, 55, 75 &amp; 95 character per line.&nbsp; After reading each article and a reading satisfaction questionnaire after each set. A final questionnaire was filled in following the last article.</p> <h3> The Results</h3> <p style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="The effect of line length on reading speed." height="286" src="http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/assets/uploads/x1322497186Screen_shot_2011-11-28_at_16.17.58.png" width="556" /></p> <p> Reading efficiency was calculated by multiplying the reading speed by the percent correct on the comprehension questions within the questionnaire. As you can see in the above graph there is a significant difference between 35cpl and 95cpl.</p> <h3> What does this mean?</h3> <p> There is pretty much one thing to take away from this, if you are a publisher of great&#8230; 1 http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog/109/the+effects+of+line+length+of+reading+online?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:27:00 +0100 The Google Penalty Shoot-out! <img src="http://cdn.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/1fa8a9a83a75fc7e4881595b5213b8a6.jpg" alt="" class=""/><br/><p> &nbsp;</p> <p> &nbsp;</p> <p> <span style="font-size:18px;"><strong>Getting Over It<span style="color: red;">*</span></strong></span></p> <h2> &nbsp;</h2> <p> Ok, so your site&#39;s up against the Google defenders and you&#39;re finding it impossible to get that all important ball (read: Keyphrase) in the back of the net, it could be that you&#39;ve suffered a Google Penalty.&nbsp;</p> <p> Below is a list of penalty shoot-outs that would likely be the cause of those enviously talented defenders (John Terry eat your heart out) keeping you from that goal:</p> <h3> <strong>On-site Penalties:&nbsp;</strong></h3> <p> <strong>Duplicate Content&nbsp;</strong></p> <p> Rest assured duplicate content alone can not be the only cause for receiving a black mark from Google, however Google will not index any content that it considers to be duplicated. So be warned - if your site consists of a lot of the stuff (pulled in from an RSS feed/articles that are featured elsewhere within the World Wide Web) the likelihood is that it will suffer as a result.&nbsp;</p> <p> <strong>Playing Hide &amp; Seek&nbsp;</strong></p> <p> It may have been fun in the playground but Google frowns heavily when it feels tricked (a grumpy Google is not a pretty Google) &ndash; never, ever be tempted to hide any text, keywords or links&#8230; 1 http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog/106/the+google+penalty+shoot-out%21?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:05:00 +0000 Charity begins in a boat. <img src="http://cdn.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/08c07b1a8c97ee3c82578b521a723934.jpg" alt="" class=""/><br/><p> The Marmalade team would like to wish&nbsp;James Adair and<b>&nbsp;</b>Ben Stenning the best of luck, when they embark on an epic journey across the Indian Ocean in April of this year.</p> <p> Rowing 3,000 miles, the couple are raising money for charity, and asked Marmalade to help out with a website to show the amazing work they were doing.&nbsp;</p> <p> You can read the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/hampshire/hi/people_and_places/newsid_9381000/9381894.stm" target="_blank">full details on the BBC website</a>, and see their&nbsp;<a href="http://www.benandjamesandaboat.co.uk/" target="_blank">lovely website here</a>.</p> 1 http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog/77/charity+begins+in+a+boat.?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:46:00 +0000 Marmy Christmas Everybody <img src="http://cdn.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/764cf1a8153828aac0d3ea0dd8c4d11f.jpg" alt="" class=""/><br/><p> Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all our clients, admirers, suppliers, lovers, haters, staff, cleaners, friends, and families!</p> <p> <a href="http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/xmas2010/index.html" target="_blank">Click here for some turkey baste fun!</a></p> 1 http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog/76/marmy+christmas+everybody?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:24:00 +0100 Mind the Gap. <img src="http://cdn.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/5d5f11891a396a50c79dc222c1121f2e.jpg" alt="" class=""/><br/><p> So as the news stories, blogs and Twitter posts&nbsp;regarding&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/06/gap-logo-new_n_753009.html" target="_blank">Gap&#39;s failed new logo release</a>,&nbsp;grow in significance, we&#39;re all starting to wonder if it wasn&#39;t just a genius piece of PR. There have even been some <a href="http://craplogo.me" target="_blank">spoof sites</a> set up.</p> <p> &nbsp;</p> <p> Conspiracy theorists are even now convincing themselves that this was all just a ruse to generate PR for the existing brand. Our suspicions were first aroused, when we noted <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/chadengle/status/27144316356" target="_blank">@chadengle&#39;s Twitter post</a>. What a great idea, we thought.</p> <p> Then the penny dropped. What better way to generate a buzz than to cause a stir in the design community, which is now so well followed and retweeted that in minutes a simple rebrand story can go global, and become the most searched for news story.&nbsp;</p> <p> What did Gap actually change? <a href="http://www.gap.com" target="_blank">Its website logo</a>? How long did that take?&nbsp;Suddenly we&#39;re all supporting the &#39;good old Gap seriffed logo&#39;. We all want it back, we never really noticed before, but isn&#39;t it great? A classic, really!&nbsp;Its now back as it was, but the story will live on, especially when its finally revealed that it was this year&#39;s biggest PR story.&nbsp;</p> <p>&#8230; 1 http://www.marmaladeontoast.co.uk/blog/75/mind+the+gap.?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Blog